Amelia E. Talley
Texas Tech University
Mackenzie A. Cook
Catherine A. Schroy
Texas Ladies’ University
Utilizing ladies’ self-identified identity that is sexual the present research compares motivations for very very first same-sex intimate encounters also linked experiential results. We additionally examine whether relations between intimate motivations and experiential results vary as a function of females’s sexual identification status. Individuals had been ladies (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex intimate contact. About 27% of females defined as exclusively heterosexual (in other words., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (i.e., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (i.e., LGB). Individuals finished a survey that is online. MH and LGB women reported very first same-sex intimate encounters which were more inspired by intimacy and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB females, EH additionally involved with less intimate tasks making use of their very very first same-sex partner. Intimacy and exploration motives had been associated with good experiential results during very very very very first same-sex contact. Associations between motivations and experiential results had been maybe maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings donate to understanding motivations and experiences linked to ladies’ very very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that not totally all ladies with a brief history of same-sex sexual contact later determine with a minority identity label that is sexual.
Humans take part in sexual intercourse for a number of reasons and, very important to the motivational method of understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are considered to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sex (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The precise reasons encouraging activity that is sexual including same-sex task, can mirror ones own wider approach or avoidance orientations ( ag e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that are theorized become associated with distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). As an example, current findings claim that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the motivation value connected with various behavior that is risk-takingBirnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and intimate stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; nude housewife Ferrey et al., 2012) and may also have broad affect psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Impett et al., 2008).
The significance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex activity that is sexual self-evident. This knowledge gets the possible to tell basic research examining facets that motivate adolescents’ and teenagers’ research of varied intimate tourist attractions and impulses and fundamentally inform a particular sexual identity to their self-identification (for example., intimate identification development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The work that is current has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative effects ( e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for people with distinct underlying motivations for sex which could potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( ag e.g., sex consuming medications or liquor).
Although initial intimate encounters could have impact that is lasting subsequent sex and development ( e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic contrast of adults’ subjective connection with and motivations with their initial intimate encounters centered on their self-identified intimate identification, no matter their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet become carried out. A person’s intimate identification is informed by different components of their sex, including their self-labeling ( ag e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) in addition to their attraction toward and engagement in sexual intercourse with lovers of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) declare that self-labeling of your respective intimate identification is of main value in considering and determining an individual’s sexual orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed sexual identification ended up being regarded as “primary over present and previous experience that may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).